Submitted By : |
cliff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition : |
Axford Bolton League |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixture : |
Walkden v Kearsley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground : |
Harriet street oval |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team : |
1st |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date : |
11/06/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toss : |
Kearsley and elected to bowl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Result : |
Kearsley won by 4 wickets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Points : |
Walkden 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Away Points : |
Kearsley 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walkden |
How Out |
Runs |
Mins |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
|
S Davies |
ct Capstick b Mather |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
TARIQ |
Run Out |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
A Iqbal |
ct McCann b Das Neves |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
D Smith |
ct Hamblett b Das Neves |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
A Baig |
lbw b Das Neves |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
R Afridi |
ct McCann b Mather |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N Rushton |
ct Dorsey b McCann |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
T Hafeez |
NOT OUT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
D Jones |
ct McCann b Das Neves |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
J Duffy |
run out |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
J Dunn |
b Das Neves |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Extras : |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total : |
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wickets : |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fall of Wicket : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bowling : |
O |
M |
R |
W |
NB |
WD |
|
Mather |
16 |
6 |
42 |
2 |
|
|
|
Thaylan |
6 |
2 |
25 |
0 |
|
|
|
Das Neves |
17.4 |
3 |
64 |
5 |
|
2 |
|
McCann |
6 |
0 |
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kearsley |
How Out |
Runs |
Mins |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
|
Das Neves |
b Jones |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
S Pellowe |
lbw Hafeez |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
C Dorsey |
ct Iqbal b Smith |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
R Haamblett |
b Hafeez |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
D Morris |
not out |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
J McCAnn |
b Tariq |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
J Capstick |
ct Smith b Afridi |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
T Thaylan |
not out |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Extras : |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total : |
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wickets : |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fall of Wicket : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bowling : |
O |
M |
R |
W |
NB |
WD |
|
Hafeez |
12 |
0 |
43 |
2 |
|
|
|
Jones |
8 |
2 |
20 |
1 |
|
|
|
Smith |
9.1 |
0 |
41 |
1 |
|
|
|
tariq |
8 |
2 |
33 |
1 |
|
|
|
Afridi |
5 |
0 |
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hope this pleases the nameless critics on the forum......... |
|
|
|
|